> The purposes, policy, decides on life and death

“Sometimes the political news is amazing. Not asking for example enough on how to curb the road deaths or deaths in the places of work, then forò to pretend to take a sé on the right the tremendous and absolute deciding the life and death of people in a vegetative state is irreversible, whereas it would be più right to rely on the willà of the human being who is directly involved.”

writes Gianfranco Fini in his book-letter to the boys were born in 1989, ‘The future of freedomà.

“The case of Eluana Englaro – continue the president of the Chamber – has proved so striking that the Italian policy still tends to occur, in the moments più bitter comparison, not according to the contemporary lines of the ‘to do’, but according to the guidelines of the twentieth century of the ‘be’, that is to say, the lines ultimately reassuring, but the real estate, identityà’.

Not looking to be judged, thereò that it produces, but thereò that it represents.

And what c’è più powerful, more evocative, more imaginative, più mobilising and at the same time, more misleading that propose itself as the ‘party of life’ against the ‘party of death’?”, adds.

“If policy obeys to these old stresses – it still asks For it; then credible then, when it is proposed as a driver of the future? Può the companyà to take from the many words neoideologiche, similideologiche or paraideologiche arriving at public opinion as a reason to hope and trust? It seems to me rather difficult”, the notes.

Similar post:  Respect: where do you walk?

Page published on 03 November 2009